History of Evolution
From Mbscientific_wiki
Historical Perspective - Man made Natural Selection and the Evolution of Genetics
Probably the most direct evidence of biotic morphogenesis in action is our own breeding experiences with animals and crops. Lets start with crops. Our agricultural experimentation started some 10,000 years ago in Mesopotamia and later on elsewhere, either independently or through diffusion. Inevitably in all cases, after each planting season the seed varieties that yielded the desired quantity and quality where selected for the next planting season. Generation after generation, this selective breeding has yielded strains of wheat, corn, rice etc., that are substantially different from their wild varieties, and better suited for consumption, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Your store bought corn, for example, is far bigger than the wild variety. Selective breeding has demonstrated morphogenesis in animals as well. Dogs, cats, horses and other livestock have similarly gone through significant transformation. Dogs vary from teacup sized Chihuahuas to enormous Great Danes. Horses vary from toy ponies to massive Clydesdales. One could compare the results of human driven selective breeding to nature driven selective evolution. If you look at variations in the sizes of rodents, say from mice to rats to Capybaras and compare it to the size variation in dogs, for example, the similarities are evident.
From a scientific perspective, the table below lays out the landmarks in the history of genetics (source: http://cogweb.ucla.edu/EP/DNA_history.html):
Year |
Topic |
Theoretical implications |
1745 |
Maupertuis proposes an adaptationist account of organic design |
Presupposes some mechanism for transmitting adaptations |
1859 |
Darwin publishes The Origin of Species, vastly strengthening the adaptationist hypothesis |
|
1865 |
Gregory Mendel publishes evidence for the discreteness and combinatorial rules of inherited traits |
Traits are carried by discrete units, or genes; the results are not appreciated until 1900 |
1869 |
Miescher discovers "nuclein" (DNA) in the cells from pus in open wounds -- cells composed mostly of nuclear material. It became known as nucleic acid after 1874, when Miescher separated it into a protein and an acid molecule. |
Suspected of exerting some function in the hereditary process |
1918-1926 |
Muller formulates the chief principles of spontaneous gene mutation as point effects of ultramicroscopic physico-chemical accidents; he induces such changes using X-rays |
The gene constitutes the basis of life and evolution by virtue of its property of reproducing its own internal changes |
1920s |
Nucleic acid found to be a major component of the chromosomes |
Its molecular structure was thought to be simple, so it was not a good candidate for a carrier of genetic information |
1930s |
Chemical nature of nuclei acid investigated. It was thought to be a tetranucleotide composed of one unit each of adenylic, guanylic, thymidylic and cytidylic acids |
The ubiquitous presence of nucleic acid in the chromosome was generally explained in purely physiological or structural terms |
early
|
The molecular weight of nucleic acid was found to be much higher than the tetranucleotide hypothesis required, but it was still viewed as a uniform polymer, like starch, unaffected by its biological source |
Hereditary information was commonly thought to reside in the chromosomal proteins, since these differ across species, between individuals, and even within an organism |
1944 |
Oswald Avery identifies nucleic acids as the active principle in bacterial transformation |
"If the results of the present study of the transforming principle are confirmed, then nucleic acids must be regarded as possessing biological specificity the chemical basis of which is as yet undetermined." |
1950 |
Erwin Chargaff shows that the four nucleotides are not present in nucleic acids in stable proportions, and that the nucleotide composition differs according to its biological source. |
The nucleic acids are not monotonous polymers. |
1952 |
Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase show that on infection of the host bacterium by a virus, at least 80% of the viral DNA enters the cell and at least 80% of the viral protein remains outside. |
DNA rather than proteins carry genetic information. |
1953 |
Watson and Crick determine that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is a double-strand helix of nucleotides. Each nucleotide consists of a deoxyribose sugar molecule to which is attached a phosphate group and one of four nitrogenous bases: two purines (A- adenine and G- guanine) and two pyrimidines (C- cytosine and T- thymine). The nucleotides are joined together by covalent bonds between the phosphate of one nucleotide and the sugar of the next, forming a phosphate-sugar backbone from which the nitrogenous bases protrude. The two strands are linked by selective hydrogen bonds: the purine adenine bonds only with the pyrimidine thymine, and the purine cytosine only with the pyrimidine guanine. |
DNA replication is possible through the complementary nature of the two strands. The chemical complexity of the molecule is thought to be sufficient to store the requisite information. The precise manner in which the information in the DNA is activated to build an organism is still very poorly understood; what is firmly demonstrated is that so-called structural genes manufacture the proteins for living tissues. |
Early 1970s |
Comparisons between chimpanzee and human genomes finds that they diverge by only 1.6%--less than most sibling species, which barely differ in morphology, and far less than that between any pair of congeneric species (Wilson 1975: 113) |
The theoretical implications are unclear; morphological and behavioral differences between the two species appeared to be unaccounted for by the genetic material (cf. Cherry et al, 1978; for an update, see <a href="http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Abstracts/Gibbons_98.html"> Gibbons 1998</a>). |
Early 1970s |
The discovery of regulator genes--genes that control the timing and output of structural genes |
Since a regulator gene may control thousands of structural genes, and indeed other regulator genes, the logical inference is that human and chimpanzee genomes are being switched on and off in quite different ways (King and Wilson 1975) |
1980s |
McClintock discovered transposable strands of genes in maize already in the 1940s, but her work was not fully recognized for a generation. |
The genome may be controlling aspects of its own mutation (see Pennisi 1998 and Chicurel 2001 for an overview). |
1984 |
McGinnis discovers homeotic (Hox) regulatory genes, responsible for the basic body plan of most animals. In subsequent work, his team demonstrates that a single mutation in a Hox gene suffices to suppress all limb development in the thoracic region of fruit flies. |
Macroevolutionary transitions, such as that from arthropods to hexapods (insects), may be initiated by point changes in regulatory genes. |
2000 |
The Human Genome Project presents its preliminary results: each of the body's 100 trillion cells contains some 3.1 billion nucleotide units. Only 1% of these are thought to be transcriptional, clustered in possibly as few as 30,000 genes. |
An accurate chemical map of the genome tells us surprisingly little about how it functions. Targeted experimentation is now possible. |
The current state of art and practice is at the initial stages of genetic engineering. In such cases gene-protein functionality is understood to the point of insertion of specific genes to garner the desired functionality. Application areas are as wide as specific treatment of a given disease in a given individual to production of bug resistant crops.
| Next: Genetic Machinery of Natural Selection | Previous: The Proto-Biotic Cascade | Home |
